Hubungan Intensitas Kebisingan dan Karakteristik Individu dengan Gangguan Pendengaran pada Pekerja Wilayah Operasi PT X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59574/jpk.v3i1.235Keywords:
Hearing loss, Noise intensity, Individual characteristics, AgeAbstract
Hearing examination in the PT X operation area shows the results of 2 workers experiencing mild deafness, 1 worker experiencing moderate deafness, and 2 workers experiencing severe deafness. Measurement of work environment noise in the PT X operation area at 21 out of 23 points has results exceeding the threshold value in accordance with the Minister of Manpower Regulation Number 5 of 2018. This study aims to analyze the relationship between noise intensity and individual characteristics with hearing loss in workers at PT X. This study used a quantitative method with a cross sectional design. Data were collected from 32 workers who had conducted audiometric examinations, as well as noise intensity measurements at 23 points of PT X's marine operations area. Data analysis was performed using the Spearman correlation test. The results showed that there was no significant relationship between noise intensity and hearing loss (significance value 0.376 > p (0.05)). However, there is a significant relationship between age and hearing loss (significance value 0.014 < p (0.05); r = 0.429. While noise intensity, tenure, length of employment, and use of hearing protection device (HPD) did not show a significant relationship with hearing loss. It is recommended to implement the "PENDA" (Hearing Management and Job Rotation) program for workers over 40 years old to protect workers from hearing loss.
References
Arifin, M., & Sari, D. (2022). Digital transformation in rural cooperatives: Strengthening accountability through technology. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 7(2), 45–58.
Bovens, M. (2007). Public accountability: A framework for the analysis and assessment of accountability arrangements in the public domain. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
KemenKop UKM. (2023). Program modernisasi koperasi berbasis teknologi digital. Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia.
Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM. (2022). Laporan kebijakan digitalisasi koperasi nasional. Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia.
Laporan Kemajuan Kelompok Tani. (2025). Laporan kemajuan pendampingan literasi keuangan Kelompok Tani Mandiri, Desa Mudung Darat, Maro Sebo, Muaro Jambi [Unpublished progress report].
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nugroho, R., Wahyuni, E., & Handayani, L. (2020). Evaluating rural cooperative performance in the digital era. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 22(1), 13–27.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Putri, N. A., & Hidayat, R. (2022). Strengthening financial literacy and transparency through financial recordkeeping training in farmer groups. Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Pertanian, 7(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpmp.2022.07.01.04
Rahmawati, L., & Prasetyo, D. (2021). Technology adoption and governance efficiency in local cooperatives. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 16(3), 112–124.
Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2021). Accounting information systems (14th ed.). Pearson.
Susanto, A. (2020). Information systems in cooperative financial management. Lingga Jaya.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pengembangan Ketenagakerjaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
